     What Does E=mc^2 Really Mean? What does the famous formual E=mc^2 really mean? It is commonly thought that this means that energy is matter and matter is energy which means that they are basically the same thing. But does this really make any sense? If you take a ball of energy, can you really make it into hard matter? At first glance, this doesn't make any sense because energy could be thought of as the motion of a particle and how can more movement lead to more particle? I have an alternate explanation for why the formula E=mc^2 is true. This isn't a statement of mass/energy equivalence any more than the classical formuala for kinetic energy KE = 1/2 mv^2. We would never confuse this formula as equating energy with mass. It is just a simple statement that mass M moving at speed V, posseses energy KE. Simple as that.What does the famous formula E=mc^2 really mean? It seems verysimilar to the formula for kinetic energy which is E=1/2 mv^2. The only way I think they could possibly be connected was if it were discovered that the release of atomic energy or generation of matter by energy is somehow the result of a collision resulting in the production of kinetic energy or matter. One of the simplest cases of energy being converted into mass is pair production whereby a photon of sufficient energy is able to produce both an electron and positron out of nothing. The energy of the photon required to do this matches E = mc^2 where m is the rest mass of the particles produced (both an electron and positron). There are two particles produced (electron, positron), so the energy required by each particle is 1/2mc^2 where m is the mass of the electronwhich also happens to be the kinetic energy formula. The particles produced head out at near light speed and if the normal kinetic energy formula holds, then the total kinetic energy of the two particles adds back up to mc^2, so the photon energy is converted entirely into kinetic energy and total energy is conserved in the reaction. The normal kinetic energy formula might not hold because realtivity says that mass increases as it approaches the speed of light and 1/2mv^2 is only valid for speeds substantially below C. My assumptions would have to presume that the normal kinetic formula does apply in this case. I believe that the changes we see in relativity are due to large masses passing through the aether. They are limited by how the aether transmit forces at only light speed. However, in the case of pair production, we are talking about only aether particles themselves which are not constrained by anything else. Therefore I believe, that the normal formula for kinetic energy will hold in this particular case.So here we can see a direct relationship between E=mc^2 and E=1/2mv^2. The intuitive explanation is that E=mc^2 in matter production because whenever matter is produced, it always makes a matter and anti-matter pair which carry away half of the incoming energy. This explains the 1/2 difference between the two formulas. However, this doesn't explain the mystery of where the electron and positron came from. It could be explained if the electron and positron were just sitting there and then got hit by photon which caused the 2 particles to go zooming out at nearly the speed of light. Science currently presumes that empty space is "empty" which leads us to the conclusion that the electron/positron came out of "nothing". While you could accept that as a postulate, it doesn't make a whole lot of sense for something to appear out of nowhere. The only way for it to make sense is if empty space were actually filled with something. People have suggested that space is filled with electrons and this would partially solve how an electron gets kicked out of so called "empty space". But I don't think this explains the positron or the general experimental properties of space.My own model of space suggests that space is actually filled with neutron-like objects. I say "neutron-like" since I'm not sure whether these are the same things as neutrons, but the particle would be similar in that it would be fundamentally be composed of a bound proton and electron. This particle forms the "aether" - a concept routinely rejected by modern science, but in this case, it helps to explain where particles come from during pair production without resorting to a magical "they somehow appear from out of nowhere" postulate. The goal of science should be to explain all phenomenon without resorting to unexplainable postulates. For those who will say that the Michaelson-Morely experiment disproved the aether, if you actually read the original paper, they didn't say they didn't find an aether drift. They, in fact, detected a tiny .01 fringe shift. The paper goes on to admit the limitations of the experiment and suggests better experiments to determine the question of aether drift. Later experiments by Dayton Miller further confirmed that an aether drift in the order of about 10km/s were detectable. This results have been routinely rejected and ignored. Not even Michaelson ever believed in the "non-aether" picture of the world. Look it up! See: This is a summary of the 1887 paper: http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/MMexp.htm This is the actual 1887 paper (1.6 MB) http://www.aip.org/history/gap/PDF/michelson.pdf This is an analysis of the Dayton Miller experiments http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm Another characteristic of the aether is that it posesses a magnetic moment due to its composition being slightly polar which causes the aether particles to line up like tiny magnets. A very rough analogy would be like how Na and Cl ions line up in a salt crystal, but instead replaced by protons and electrons. In this model, photons are pure wave phenomenon which use the aether as the wave medium. The effect is to cause slight forward and back movements of the aether particles. You might imagine that if you shook one of the aether particles with a sufficiently high energy wave, that you might get it to break down into component electron and proton. Since the electron is so much less massive than the proton, we would naturally expect to see electrons ejected well before protons. Waves normally propagate at the speed of light through the aether, but in the case of an electron ejection, the forward movement of the wave at the electron's location is transferred entirely to the electron causing it to acclerate away at nearly the speed of light. When the electron is ejected from the aether matrix, what it leaves behind is a hole in the alternating proton/electron aether matrix. This is the positron. It is not postively charged due to it having some inherent charge. It is positively charged because the surrounding positive protons are not neutralized by the missing electron. This positron is also acclerated away at nearly the speed of light. So now we have a complete picture of pair production which doesn't rely on any mysterious postulates or anything that we would find out of the ordinary in classical mechanics. It does rely on the existence of an aether, but this is nothing mysterious and has a simple physical representation as an array of neutrons. The meaning of E=mc^2 now becomes clear. This equations does not imply that energy is converted into matter, rather this is the energy required to eject matter out of the aether which is normally invisible. 